Trump Targets Law Firm Perkins Coie: A Bombshell Investigation that Could Shatter the Justice Department

The storm surrounding law firm Perkins Coie has been brewing for weeks, with speculation and theories emerging about the motives behind President Trump's unprecedented attack on the firm. At the center of the maelstrom is the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the organization that handled Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign in 2016. Perkins Coie served as the DNC's general counsel, providing legal advice and representation. However, it appears that the firm's involvement in the DNC has put it squarely in the crosshairs of the Trump administration.

The investigation into Perkins Coie has been led by the House Judiciary Committee, with Republican Chairman Jim Jordan and Democratic Ranking Member Jerry Nadler working together to get to the bottom of the matter. Their inquiry has focused on the firm's work with the DNC, as well as its representation of other organizations that have been linked to the Clinton campaign. At the heart of the investigation is the question of whether Perkins Coie provided improper assistance to the Clinton campaign, potentially compromising the integrity of the election.

The Role of Perkins Coie in the 2016 Election

Perkins Coie has been a prominent player in the Democratic Party for decades, providing legal services to numerous organizations and individuals. In 2016, the firm was hired by the DNC to provide general counsel and representation. The agreement was reportedly worth over $10 million, with Perkins Coie handling everything from contract negotiations to election law advice.

However, the firm's involvement with the DNC has raised eyebrows. In 2016, Perkins Coie was also representing the state of Minnesota in a voter ID lawsuit, which had been filed by the DNC. This dual representation has led some to question whether the firm was attempting to influence the outcome of the election through its work with the Minnesota government.

The Key Players Involved

Several high-profile individuals have been implicated in the Perkins Coie controversy. These include:

• Michael Cohen: The former Trump lawyer was a key player in the investigation, with his company, Crown Acquisition Corp., having done work for the Minnesota state government.
• David Axelrod: The former Obama campaign manager was reportedly involved in the negotiations between the DNC and Perkins Coie.
• PlumTree Equity Partners: A private equity firm that had invested in Perkins Coie, but was reportedly involved in the firm's dealings with the Minnesota state government.

The involvement of these key players has added fuel to the fire, with many questioning the motives behind the Trump administration's attack on Perkins Coie.

The Investigation: What We Know So Far

The House Judiciary Committee's investigation into Perkins Coie has been ongoing for several months, with the committee issuing multiple requests for information and testimony. In June, the committee subpoenaed several former Perkins Coie employees, including Natalie Mulone, who had worked as a paralegal on the Minnesota voter ID lawsuit.

The investigation has also focused on the firm's financial dealings, with Bromium Consulting Group being identified as a company that had received payments from Perkins Coie. The company has denied any wrongdoing, but the fact that it was being paid by the firm raises questions about the potential for conflicts of interest.

Key Documents and Evidence

Several key documents and pieces of evidence have been released as part of the investigation, including:

• Emails and memos: Shared between Perkins Coie and the Minnesota state government, these documents detail the firm's work on the voter ID lawsuit.
• Financial records: Shared between Perkins Coie and PlumTree Equity Partners, these records reveal the extent of the firm's financial dealings with the private equity firm.
• Testimony: Michael Cohen and David Axelrod have both testified before the House Judiciary Committee, providing insight into the firm's dealings with the DNC and the Minnesota state government.

The release of these documents has shed new light on the investigation, but much remains unclear. As the House Judiciary Committee continues to probe the matter, it's likely that more information will come to light in the coming weeks and months.

What It Means for the Justice Department

The Trump administration's attack on Perkins Coie has significant implications for the Justice Department. The investigation into the law firm has raised questions about the potential for influence peddling and corruption, which could have far-reaching consequences for the department.

The Justice Department has been under scrutiny in recent years, with the appointment of Jeff Sessions as Attorney General sparking controversy. The investigation into Perkins Coie has added fuel to the fire, with some arguing that the department's handling of the matter has been inadequate.

Potential Consequences for the Justice Department

The investigation into Perkins Coie has raised several potential consequences for the Justice Department, including:

• Loss of public trust: The department's handling of the investigation has been criticized, with some arguing that it has eroded the public's trust in the institution.
• Career burnout: The investigation has put a strain on the department's resources, with some arguing that it has led to burnout among career prosecutors.
• Future investigations: The department's reputation may be impacted by the investigation, potentially impacting its ability to conduct future investigations and prosecutions.

The investigation into Perkins Coie is a complex and multifaceted one, with many twists and turns. As the House Judiciary Committee continues to probe the matter, it's likely that more information will come to light in the coming weeks and months.

What It Means for the Democratic Party

The investigation into Perkins Coie has significant implications for the Democratic Party, which has been accused of colluding with Russia in the 2016 election. The party has been vocal in its criticism of the investigation, with some arguing that it is a witch hunt.

The investigation has also raised questions about the party's reliance on Perkins Coie, with some arguing that the firm's involvement in